There is a certain threshold beyond which the sociopathy of a Jewish intellectual like Yaron Brook achieves an almost alien quality. It is one thing to be a sociopath; quite another to extoll the total untethering of the individual from any kind of higher morality as the greatest cause to which one can devote their life. Hearing Brook talk about how the Allied bombing campaign against Germany should serve as a guidepost for American foreign policy gives readers the feeling they’re in the presence of something not made of flesh, as in a recent meme that presents Mark Zuckerberg as Star Trek’s Data intent on collecting the personal information of users of Facebook in order to learn what it means to be human.
Brook outdoes himself in a piece entitled “The Morality of Moneylending: A Short History.” The title is misleading, since its author does not dispassionately present a history, but rather presents a historiography with Jews (from Shakespeare’s Shylock to California’s Michael Milken) depicted as misunderstood and falsely persecuted heroes who are unfairly punished for their enterprise, industry, and value creation (all contrary to economic, philosophical, and theological arguments that lambast “barren metal” and extol those things which hold an intrinsic value).
Read the rest: Putting Shylock to Shame: The Moneylender Portrayed as Hero | The Occidental Observer – White Identity, Interests, and Culture
icareviews 
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/embed/328f5ddc-7445-4442-8cb4-46115bed217b?autoplay=false
I don’t recall any great scandal over Seven‘s thinly-veiled Shylock. A wealthy defense attorney, no less.
I’ll have to revisit that one to remind myself. I haven’t seen it since taking an interest in the JQ.
Did that guy write “Greed” on the carpet with his own diarrhea?
He pretty talented actually.
A pound of flesh could only be a wink at The Merchant of Venice.
https://sites.google.com/a/my.lr.edu/seven-deadly-sins/greed
Seven was probably the first film where I became aware of the “numinous Negro”. The Morgan Freeman character, world-weary but equanimous, counterposed to the irascible and impetuous Pitt.
Did somebody say “Den of thieves”?:
http://murderbymedia.org/2015/12/27/how-to-spot-a-jew-101/
I refuse to believe that Hitchcock wasn’t Jewish. Agreed?
Mainly because of the more prominent lower lip.
An ugly face is pretty weak evidence of Jewishness. Look at Charles Laughton or Hugh Griffith. Look at King George III. Do you assume this about Hitchcock because he happens to have been a talented filmmaker who also participated in the production of war propaganda for the British government? If everybody who worked in British intelligence was Jewish, you’d almost have to assume that Jews were so prodigiously fecund as to have displaced the indigenous population of Britain. Speculation of this sort is a waste of time without any actual evidence.
I don’t know where you got “ugly” from. I was talking about a Jewish look. And no, Hitchcock’s opus didn’t inform my opinion about his Ashkenazi-like lips and philtrum. Have a look at some of the Der Stürmer cartoons. Long before the rhinoplasty and other Aryanization procedures, Germans could well recognize racial stereotypes (which cartoonist doesn’t accurately capture an archetype?)
But relax, it’s nothing more just a personal conviction of mine about Hitchcock.
The etymology of Jewfish is much debated; for my money it’s the very Jewish mouth of the fish, the prominent lower lip (à la Hitchcock, Alan Greenspan, etc..)
http://thejewniverse.com/2015/how-the-jewfish-got-its-name/
Anyway, the controversy abated thanks to a bit of name-change activism. Goliath Groper, take a bow!
I rest my case:
